Close Menu

The Differences Between Binding and Non Binding Arbitration in Florida

LegalPI

What Is Non-Binding Arbitration?

Non-binding arbitration is a private dispute resolution process where an arbitrator’s decision is advisory only, and the parties are not required to accept it. This process allows parties to present their case to a neutral arbitrator or panel, who then issues a written opinion. The parties can use this opinion to guide their negotiations toward a settlement.

An image showing the difference between binding and non-binding arbitration

Purpose of Non-Binding Arbitration

Non-binding arbitration is often used when parties want to avoid the time, expense, and formality of a trial, or when they want to explore creative solutions. It can also be used to assess the parties’ positions when they are too far apart for mediation.

 

Benefits of Non-Binding Arbitration

Non-binding arbitration can help parties:

  • Get a sense of how a court might rule on their dispute: The arbitrator’s opinion provides insight into the potential outcome of a trial.
  • Avoid open legal conflict and bad press: Non-binding arbitration is a private process that helps maintain confidentiality.
  • Discover their case’s strengths and weaknesses: The arbitrator’s opinion highlights areas where the parties’ arguments are strong or weak.
  • Formulate realistic goals: The process helps parties set achievable objectives based on the arbitrator’s assessment.
  • Create a more sociable environment: Non-binding arbitration can foster a collaborative atmosphere, encouraging parties to work together towards a settlement.

 

Drawbacks of Non-Binding Arbitration

Non-binding arbitration can be time-consuming and expensive if the parties need to continue their dispute in court. The arbitrator’s decision is not legally binding, and the other party can still pursue legal action.

The Process of Non-Binding Arbitration

  1. Parties Present Their Case: Both parties present their arguments and evidence to a neutral arbitrator or panel.
  2. Arbitrator Issues a Written Opinion: The arbitrator provides a written opinion based on the evidence presented.
  3. Parties Negotiate: The parties use the arbitrator’s opinion to guide their negotiations toward a settlement.
  4. Optional Trial: If the parties cannot reach a settlement, they may proceed to a trial.

 

Comparing Binding vs. Non-Binding Arbitration

Aspect Binding Arbitration Non-Binding Arbitration
Legal Binding Nature The arbitrator’s decision is final and legally binding. The arbitrator’s decision is advisory only and not legally binding.
Process Parties agree to accept the arbitrator’s decision as final. Parties are free to reject the arbitrator’s decision and proceed to trial.
Potential Outcomes The arbitrator’s decision is enforceable by law. The arbitrator’s decision is not enforceable by law.

 

Key Differences Between Non-Binding and Binding Arbitration

  • Binding Arbitration: The arbitrator’s decision is final and legally binding.
  • Non-Binding Arbitration: The arbitrator’s decision is advisory only, and the parties are not required to accept it.

 

Florida’s Non-Binding Arbitration Process

In Florida, non-binding arbitration is a hybrid between mediation and arbitration. If the parties are unhappy with the arbitrator’s decision, they can file a motion with the court to proceed to a trial. However, there is a “poison pill” built in: if the parties go to trial and win 25% less than what they won at arbitration, they will owe the other side’s attorneys fees and costs.

 

Common Misconceptions About Non-Binding Arbitration

  • Myth 1: Non-binding arbitration is always a waste of time.
    • Fact: Non-binding arbitration can be a valuable tool for resolving disputes, especially when parties are too far apart for mediation.
  • Myth 2: Non-binding arbitration is only used for minor disputes.
    • Fact: Non-binding arbitration can be used for a wide range of disputes, including complex business disputes and personal injury cases.

 

Preparing for Non-Binding Arbitration

  1. Gather Evidence: Collect all relevant documents and evidence to support your case.
  2. Select an Arbitrator: Choose a neutral and experienced arbitrator to handle your case.
  3. Understand the Arbitration Process: Familiarize yourself with the arbitration process and the potential outcomes.

 

An image showing a lawyer in a non-binding arbitration hearing

 

Financial Considerations

Non-binding arbitration can be less expensive than litigation, as it avoids the costs associated with a trial. However, the costs of non-binding arbitration can still be significant, especially if the parties need to continue their dispute in court.

 

Considerations Before Opting for Non-Binding Arbitration

Before choosing non-binding arbitration, it is essential to understand the process and its implications. Consulting with an experienced personal injury attorney can help you handle the intricacies of non-binding arbitration and determine if it is the right choice for your case.

 

Expert Guidance from Rosen Injury Law

At Rosen Injury Law, our team of experienced personal injury attorneys can provide expert guidance on non-binding arbitration and help you make informed decisions about your case. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and learn more about how we can help you achieve the justice and compensation you deserve.

Source:

leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0044/Sections/0044.103.html

 

Table of Contents